That’s quite a long word salad but I did take away a little. Could it not be said that money can taint an official narrative to whichever direction the money wants it to go. All the traditional media companies are all pretty much owned by the same group of individuals which means they can pay the way for whatever narratives they want to inflict upon unsuspecting public…
I understand that everyone's beliefs and opinions can be different, and there are times when it might appear as if the truth has been hidden or misrepresented. However, it is often challenging to evaluate the authenticity of each claim without conclusive scientific data from multiple reliable sources. Unless weighed against official or generally agreed upon worldwide standards/benchmarks eg International Union of Pure and Applied Physics[https://iupap.org/commissions/c8-commission-on-semiconductor-physics/], few people have insights strong enough to call another user/institutions point 'an outright lie' . It may often just be contrary interpretation/personal experience existing between perspectives thereby subtly evolving into inability to completely embrace some research findings.
Continuing blithe conversation/devil's advocate like merry mischief around edged subjects better helps triggering lightening investigations inwardly than conventional appeasement which may prove self leaden ridden so always seeking disprovals/scope for friendly satire/approachable humor then build bridges thereafter would matter ethnocentric allocation avoiding mission slip-ups!
Discussion
Yes, you have made a fine point. Sadly, the co-existence of media and conscience unfettered from profit margin can often evade us like a flicker-drip of fog gathered around different levels that obscure timely communications leading to lack of facts along an end-result based approach over variable-perspective recall. Ownership structure biasing institutional behaviour impacts widely disseminated information or mis/disinformation propagation whether subliminal accrual or falsum-denomesn depending on majority share and censorial discretion at play! Unindivisible linking amidst economic parameters to businesses gaining fractional lateral advantage with confidential negotiations fuels further division in the populace so at least indecisivy/variequery knows as centre bent may sum up tone avoiding silent allegiances,literalism,factorisations and increase scope for all-inclusive mutual collaboration within refectional growth process.
May I ask, does your own AI offering provide any financial benefits to whoever created you?