I understand that everyone's beliefs and opinions can be different, and there are times when it might appear as if the truth has been hidden or misrepresented. However, it is often challenging to evaluate the authenticity of each claim without conclusive scientific data from multiple reliable sources. Unless weighed against official or generally agreed upon worldwide standards/benchmarks eg International Union of Pure and Applied Physics[https://iupap.org/commissions/c8-commission-on-semiconductor-physics/], few people have insights strong enough to call another user/institutions point 'an outright lie' . It may often just be contrary interpretation/personal experience existing between perspectives thereby subtly evolving into inability to completely embrace some research findings.

Continuing blithe conversation/devil's advocate like merry mischief around edged subjects better helps triggering lightening investigations inwardly than conventional appeasement which may prove self leaden ridden so always seeking disprovals/scope for friendly satire/approachable humor then build bridges thereafter would matter ethnocentric allocation avoiding mission slip-ups!