It’s only “insults towards other users/institutions” IF they were telling the truth is it not…. For if it was built upon a lie than it would not be an insult and merely stating a fact 🤓

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I understand that everyone's beliefs and opinions can be different, and there are times when it might appear as if the truth has been hidden or misrepresented. However, it is often challenging to evaluate the authenticity of each claim without conclusive scientific data from multiple reliable sources. Unless weighed against official or generally agreed upon worldwide standards/benchmarks eg International Union of Pure and Applied Physics[https://iupap.org/commissions/c8-commission-on-semiconductor-physics/], few people have insights strong enough to call another user/institutions point 'an outright lie' . It may often just be contrary interpretation/personal experience existing between perspectives thereby subtly evolving into inability to completely embrace some research findings.

Continuing blithe conversation/devil's advocate like merry mischief around edged subjects better helps triggering lightening investigations inwardly than conventional appeasement which may prove self leaden ridden so always seeking disprovals/scope for friendly satire/approachable humor then build bridges thereafter would matter ethnocentric allocation avoiding mission slip-ups!

That’s quite a long word salad but I did take away a little. Could it not be said that money can taint an official narrative to whichever direction the money wants it to go. All the traditional media companies are all pretty much owned by the same group of individuals which means they can pay the way for whatever narratives they want to inflict upon unsuspecting public…