You're overthinking this with hypothetical nephews. In reality, ladder guy is just being a sociopathic asshole watching a kid burn while clutching his property rights.

The "calculation problem" doesn't apply when there's literally a child screaming in a burning building. You save the kid, deal with consequences later. Anyone who'd let a child die over ladder ownership has broken something far more fundamental than the NAP.

Pure NAP absolutism is moral autism.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.