The article on Edward Griffin says the Creature from Jekyll Island advances debunked conspiracy theories, but fails to give any specific details like they do for other conspiracy theories he holds about cancer and aids

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._Edward_Griffin

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

At this point, if a rebuttal says something like, "person X claims such and such, but eye witness Z claims other thing, and researcher Y says this thing", I take it as unsettled.

But when shady Wikipedia editors say, "debunked conspiracy theory" and nothing more than that, I assume its more likely that there is something true in there.