nostr:note1d8hgcwt0gj38tfgmxuqy2av9rwesk2c08j46d5pte69406ts8ezqxx5z8a
Talking about social-media vs non-social-media use cases for me sometimes feels weird.
Most of the stuff that nostr improves *is* social media, understanding that term as "things that benefit from a social graph". In that sense, i.e. nostr:npub1zapstrdhq7rxrw224apgvs5ajlh9y473f2rdd0a9fjcys2u8d7cqzxqhp9 is a social media client, it's just not focused on short-text as the main driver but rather songs and podcasts.
With that caveat out of the way:
yes, as a developer mostly focused on non-twitter-like interactions, often I find myself having to think around the design constraint of kind:1s being, well, #1. -- I don't think is a big deal, but would be nice if all use cases had mostly equal footing in the protocol.