Replying to Avatar PABLOF7z

nostr:note1d8hgcwt0gj38tfgmxuqy2av9rwesk2c08j46d5pte69406ts8ezqxx5z8a

Talking about social-media vs non-social-media use cases for me sometimes feels weird.

Most of the stuff that nostr improves *is* social media, understanding that term as "things that benefit from a social graph". In that sense, i.e. nostr:npub1zapstrdhq7rxrw224apgvs5ajlh9y473f2rdd0a9fjcys2u8d7cqzxqhp9 is a social media client, it's just not focused on short-text as the main driver but rather songs and podcasts.

With that caveat out of the way:

yes, as a developer mostly focused on non-twitter-like interactions, often I find myself having to think around the design constraint of kind:1s being, well, #1. -- I don't think is a big deal, but would be nice if all use cases had mostly equal footing in the protocol.

I think I get what you’re saying and agree that kind 1 viewable text should be equal to hidden data

I’d argue privacy (hidden data of any kind) is more important than free speech… because without privacy there is no free Speech

Perhaps it’s simply because the first interaction between humans is open communication … and so kind 1 takes prevalence

You openly agree To communicate with another human before you choose if you want to speak in private

Kind 1 is a priority for community

For self sovereignty it’s privacy

So from a Self Sovereign perspective, privacy is equal to or more important than Kind 1

Should we look at nostr, community first or self sovereign first ?

Are you thinking community first?

That’s my 2 sats

(I don’t have an answer)

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.