nostr:npub1q6ya7kz84rfnw6yjmg5kyttuplwpauv43a9ug3cajztx4g0v48eqhtt3sh and nostr:npub1m4ny6hjqzepn4rxknuq94c2gpqzr29ufkkw7ttcxyak7v43n6vvsajc2jl and others have raised this point. It’s important to hear, and I’m not sure you have acknowledged.
Editable posts breaks nostr. If user on A client sees all versions, but users on B, C, D clients only see the first version, then nostr is broken. Users cannont have a reliable conversation anymore.
This is serious flaw in your implementation. Until … what? … all client MYST adopt editable posts?
#nostrisforked
No it's not. It's a choice. If you don't want to see edits, you don't need to implement it and as a user, you don't need to use a client that does it. You would see exactly the same thing as if edits didn't exist. It's perfectly backwards compatible.
Also, posts don't look the same in all clients. That's a myth. They will never look the same. We all render different things.
Dude. Posts don’t look the same, but the content SHOULD be the same.
And a user who “disables” editing in a client capable of editing … GFY. That’s not the problem case.
ALL edits are the problem, for ALL clients who don’t implement edits.
For clarification: if a note is edited,will the new version be pushed to all clients? Or will some clients show the original note, some show the updated note without history, and other show the current plus history?
The edited note will be pushed to the relays and the various clients will display (or not display) it the way they are configured.
