How exactly does the state think it can “change the origin” of #bitcoin, and what would that realistically mean for people running their own nodes, verifying the UTXO set, and holding their coins in self-custody? Outside of BRC-20 tokens and other “non-monetary” uses of the chain, would any such changes actually undermine the baseline premise of Bitcoin’s permissionless, censorship-resistant, and decentralized design? For node operators who verify everything themselves, isn’t the point that any state-endorsed changes can simply be rejected by the community?