No, the use of BTC is for everyone, but the state feels it will try to change the original nature of Bitcoin.
Discussion
How exactly does the state think it can “change the origin” of #bitcoin, and what would that realistically mean for people running their own nodes, verifying the UTXO set, and holding their coins in self-custody? Outside of BRC-20 tokens and other “non-monetary” uses of the chain, would any such changes actually undermine the baseline premise of Bitcoin’s permissionless, censorship-resistant, and decentralized design? For node operators who verify everything themselves, isn’t the point that any state-endorsed changes can simply be rejected by the community?