Wanting verifiable facts isn't a left vs right thing. It's a truth vs fiction thing. If sources are a thing of the Other... That's a good sign that your beliefs are not well founded.
Discussion
dumbass, you better read what OPSEC is and then think about what "verifiable fact" means in this context. You are leftwing cunt and a troll, you want everything to be fact checked when you could do your own research or let people say what they want. You are inherently marxist piece of shit.
Lmao someone's clearly salty as fuck about being told they're wrong too many times. Yeah, I know some about operational security, and if you're making claims about security, you should be able to justify them to at least some extent. Running your mouth without knowing what you're talking about could land someone in hot shit.
you don't know shit about "security" zero sources and proof of that claim, it must mean you are spreading hateful misinformation cunt
imagine this: someone asks a question, the answer is usually too complicated to give "verified answer", like some people need better security or someone needs more privacy. On top of this there could be multiple solutions to one problem. You can't "verify" everything i say online, no matter the topic.
If it's too complicated to give a justifiable explanation on a concrete topic, you don't fully understand what you're talking about. There may not be one single correct answer, and how to balance privacy and security is a subjective topic, but claims about privacy and security should be verifiable.
im sure you'd trust META's fact checkers, with your logic you can't say anything without fact checkers
Lmao the whole point of being able to cite your own sources for facts is that you don't need to trust the fact checkers. You have access to the sources and can evaluate them yourself.
LMAO the whole point is that you are spreading marxist propaganda and lying pathologically, then u scream about "fact checking".