I'm starting to think that all privacy communities are inherently flawed and toxic. There is always some retard demanding for source in hopes to stop misinformation. Problem is that it leads to troll behaviour, like sometimes doing google search would give you the result you want but the retards are like bUt yOu dOnT hAve a sOurCe. It's inherently leftwing value to ask for source all the time not matter what is the topic.

#leftism #privacy #security #forums

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Wanting verifiable facts isn't a left vs right thing. It's a truth vs fiction thing. If sources are a thing of the Other... That's a good sign that your beliefs are not well founded.

dumbass, you better read what OPSEC is and then think about what "verifiable fact" means in this context. You are leftwing cunt and a troll, you want everything to be fact checked when you could do your own research or let people say what they want. You are inherently marxist piece of shit.

Lmao someone's clearly salty as fuck about being told they're wrong too many times. Yeah, I know some about operational security, and if you're making claims about security, you should be able to justify them to at least some extent. Running your mouth without knowing what you're talking about could land someone in hot shit.

you don't know shit about "security" zero sources and proof of that claim, it must mean you are spreading hateful misinformation cunt

I haven't made any claims about security, but if I did, yeah, I'd cite some sources. You're they one crying about not being able to spout unfounded bullshit

imagine this: someone asks a question, the answer is usually too complicated to give "verified answer", like some people need better security or someone needs more privacy. On top of this there could be multiple solutions to one problem. You can't "verify" everything i say online, no matter the topic.

If it's too complicated to give a justifiable explanation on a concrete topic, you don't fully understand what you're talking about. There may not be one single correct answer, and how to balance privacy and security is a subjective topic, but claims about privacy and security should be verifiable.

im sure you'd trust META's fact checkers, with your logic you can't say anything without fact checkers

Lmao the whole point of being able to cite your own sources for facts is that you don't need to trust the fact checkers. You have access to the sources and can evaluate them yourself.

LMAO the whole point is that you are spreading marxist propaganda and lying pathologically, then u scream about "fact checking".

I seriously doubt you even know what the word Marxist even means. You're just throwing buzz words around and raging like a toddler being told no.

I think you kost your paicfier, kiddo

im not your fact checker, nigga

If you wanna make claims, it's not my job to do your research for you. Your claims, your responsibility to support them.

This post is silly.

If someone says something concerning and important that affects people, it's only natural to want to know where the information is coming from in order to dig deeper into the issue.

Furthermore, don't trust. Verify.

"verifying" is another word for fascism

you are responsible for the fact checking, not me. you are silly for asking to fact check wvery privacy claim made online, fuck off leftist whore.

now u wanna confirm what features custom roms have since u are too lazy to google? fuck u lazy scum

i dont have a duty to be your search engine if you are privacy noob yourself, amoeba