Maybe certain factions shouldn’t be pushing through an extremely controversial soft fork in the first place, increasing the risk for a situation like this 🤷‍♂️

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I get that, but I see a MASF as a sort of separation of powers. There are people who want drivechains, and the miners are the only option.

Otherwise, complete control belongs to the Core developers. Namely a handful of people who have authority to merge code.

Getting mass consensus when Michael Saylor shares videos with verifiably false information is not an easy task.