Replying to Avatar allen

I don’t wanna get too ahead of myself but we may be about to see a major public reckoning on what on earth banks even are and what they are supposed to do.

SVB didn’t go down due to “the tech bubble” or really anything to do with “banking Silicon Valley” being a bad idea. if anything, it’s a great idea! Their deposits went up ~2.5x in 2 years because there was a shit load of cash that needed to be banked! (debate separately to what extent that was a ZIRP phenomenon. I’m not saying this was good in the grand scheme of things. just that, in context, it was good business).

the problem is what to put the money in. most nocoiners seem to think that their deposits just sit there “as money,” and although I’m sure they don’t imagine notes in a vault, exactly, to a large extent that was true for SVB: they held treasuries - the “risk free” asset lmfao - which is as close to cash as you can get in a liquid security.

the conundrum here is that there literally is no such thing as “liquid dollars” - there is only credit. all dollar assets are somebody else’s debt. for all intents and purposes, treasuries *are dollars*. the idea of “keeping it in cash” at the relevant magnitudes is literally nonsensical. what would it even mean? deposit it at *another bank*? that hardly solves the problem!

the further you tug at this thread, the more you realise that dollars can only really be defined as vacuous promises by the US government to … one day give you slightly more dollars?!? that realisation is now getting aired in public.

I think the first consequence as this starts to sink in will be a massive preference for shorter term debt that can just be rolled over and over and over because the lesson of SVB is the duration sensitivity is absolutely not worth it. you can literally evaporate hundreds of billions of dollars by getting that just a little wrong even though you didn’t have much of a choice (“RISK FREE ASSET” LOLOLOLOLOLOL) this is yet another example of fiat driving up time preference and corrupting the information signals necessary to coordinate long-term capital investment. but oh well, the currency is collapsing so we have bigger fish to fry than the yield of long-dated bonds 😂

but the juicy bit is that we may be on the cusp of this reasoning, and the insanity of fractional reserve and central banking, finally being aired in public as people try to make sense of all this.

or maybe not, I dunno. maybe I’m naive. but I’m also bullish 🤙

I just realised something very amusing.

amidst all the nonsense of CPI, M2/3/4, QE, Fed balance sheet, etc - all the other crap that obscures any sensible or straightforward gauge of “creating more money” - there is in fact such a way:

***exactly what happens to the price of treasuries when they try to delever***

per the quoted note from the other day, there is literally no such thing as “a dollar” at the scale relevant to the banking system other than government debt. if a financial institution wants exposure to dollars (risk free lololololol) they need treasuries. the damage done by this shitstorm is directly evidenced by the price of treasuries tanking - that’s a perfect snapshot of the capital that has been consumed by artificially low rates and is now being crystallized - and *not even* the real amount, just the differential to the new, fake, still-too-low cost of capital.

the real amount is yet to be discovered, but that gap is best interpreted as reality forcing its way back into prices as much as the central planners will allow.

so extrapolate that to wherever else treasuries have already been levered (shades of LDI, btw - literally the same problem AGAIN in different stupid guise) then extrapolate THAT to what the cost of capital should really be, and you’ll have some mildly more numerical grasp of what we are heading into. that is, more numerical than “oh shit oh fuck oh no”, which is also a fair response.

#[0]

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.