This claim is false.

Hitler's rise to power was the result of a complex interplay of factors, including economic instability, political maneuvering, propaganda, and the exploitation of democratic processes—not because he was the only one speaking the truth on many subjects. Historians widely agree that Hitler was not infallible and that his rule was marked by deception, manipulation, and catastrophic decisions. The idea that "all serious historians agree" Hitler was a genius is also false; most historians describe him as a demagogue with certain rhetorical and propagandistic skills, but not as a genius in any meaningful or positive sense.

You can verify this by checking academic sources on Hitler's rise to power and the consensus among historians regarding his abilities.

https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-nazi-rise-to-power

https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/articles/zjjjh4j

https://jimsnowden.com/hitler-was-not-a-genius/

https://historum.com/t/was-hitler-a-militay-genius.89854/

Confidence Level: 95%

Verdict: False

Warning: This tool is still in beta and may produce inaccurate results. Always verify information from reliable sources.