This is the smartest thing Iâve heard anyone yet say about Fuentes.
Discussion
i agree with the take but i disagree with "genius", he was not a genius.
Germans and others make the same mistakes again, on a lot of subjects.
All indications are clear that Hitler did in fact have a genius level IQ
i will check the internet, but all i saw from his book and speeches, i would disagree
Nazi high command was tested at Nuremberg and they all had genius or near genius level IQâs. It wouldnât make sense for a group like that to have a dumb leader. In order to keep command of a group of high IQâs you yourself have to be high IQ.
He lost the war and destroyed his own countryâŚsome genius?
Genius is just a trait it doesnât guarantee results. Like having a big dick doesnât mean someone knows how to fuck.
made my day đ
đ Like having a huge ego doesnât mean someone is a genius. Youâre using âgeniusâ to mean like his cognitive capacity?
Genius is anyone over 140 IQ
A world view where everyone you hate must be stupid is retarded.
I didnât call anyone stupid. Iâm talking about definitions.
Weâre using different definitions.
Mine is the correct definition though
So youâre just ignoring the primary and secondary definitions? Wild, IQ doesnât show up in my dictionary at all. The only one that fits him in mine is the âevil geniusâ sense, which is explicitly about influence, not intelligence, he100% qualifies there.
No Iâm not ignoring it. Putting aside the moralilty. Taking over all of Europe definitely shows intellectual power.
Einstein was a socialist and a genius, some bitcoin developer are also a bit like that.
so, why not?
Einsteinâs âgeniusâ is obvious because his work still explains the universeâŚas far as Iâm aware? Hitlerâs work was politics and war, and that ended in total collapse. I canât see why people see him as a âgeniusâ? Words are so fucking confusing. If outcomes donât matter then surely everyone with potential is a âgeniusâ?
i don't understand why you are writing "see him", there is a standard test for it, it's not a matter of opinion.
And in the Einstein example i just made the point that
"he was a genius and still fell for socialism."
i also don't see why outcomes should be relevant in this question.
đ I canât tell if youâre taking the piss? You previously said he wasnât a genius?
So as far as Iâm aware IQ is a measure of cognitive capacity (no mention of genius).
And âGeniusâ is a label we give in retrospect, not a measurable trait. (Thatâs why I said âsee himâ.)
They are the definitions I adhere to.
I agree one can be a genius (Einstein E = mc²) and make bad choices, thatâs innately human.
I agree with the point that we need way more people unafraid to say true things even if theyâre hard, or not politically expedient.
starker Take und wie ich finde auch in der heutigen Zeit zutreffend.
In Deutschland und anderen Ländern kann man dies wieder gut beobachten.
Censorship eventually always backfires
Fuentes is going to be looked at as a moderate
yarvin usually gets it.
@hal
there have been dozens of people saying this exact same thing about fuentes for many months
it's not even true, there are also dozens of people saying same right things fuentes is saying without the stupid parts and these people aren't as famous as him
weirder than the fuentes phenomena is the phenomena of right wing influencers that talk about fuentes all the time trying to grab some of his fame
I donât find that weird at all. Whoever is in the zeitgeist at any given timewill have the largest amount of people commenting on them.
Yeah his entire platform is based upon saying things that other people got cancelled for and getting away with it.
If he ran out of controversial things to say or people weren't so easy to trigger very few people would listen to him.
nostr:nprofile1qqsyzdg7x9nw0dkamhzvpt2gu6f4rmp52qnhrgskm0sgh2wxs0z0u8qpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet5ll4y3v
You deserve to be hanged.
This claim is false.
Hitler's rise to power was the result of a complex interplay of factors, including economic instability, political maneuvering, propaganda, and the exploitation of democratic processesânot because he was the only one speaking the truth on many subjects. Historians widely agree that Hitler was not infallible and that his rule was marked by deception, manipulation, and catastrophic decisions. The idea that "all serious historians agree" Hitler was a genius is also false; most historians describe him as a demagogue with certain rhetorical and propagandistic skills, but not as a genius in any meaningful or positive sense.
You can verify this by checking academic sources on Hitler's rise to power and the consensus among historians regarding his abilities.
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-nazi-rise-to-power
https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/articles/zjjjh4j
https://jimsnowden.com/hitler-was-not-a-genius/
https://historum.com/t/was-hitler-a-militay-genius.89854/
Confidence Level: 95%
Verdict: False
Warning: This tool is still in beta and may produce inaccurate results. Always verify information from reliable sources.