Yes, as someone who doesn't deeply understand the mechanics of this particular spam nor the general theory of spam mitigation, agree.

It's a bit more than bad PR because of blind reliance on core implementation by majority means they get to make this type of call. Silver lining might be that awareness raised over a lesser issue than one that may come in future, at which time we can hope for more diverse options and more educated users, and changes to core defaults won't be law necessarily 🤔

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

$2T USD total market value and we are still letting the devs talk directly to the users. No corporation that size would dream of doing something so stupid. Big companies use a translator for Dev <-> User communication for a reason.

I don't like the idea of some suits interfacing with node runners more than devs...

Conclusion is maybe there should be no such thing as "The devs"?

I'd be willing to take the job of translating between dev and human for the core team. I promise not to wear a suit.

You need more conflict of interest to gain interest from Opensats.

I hear Vitalik is having public relations issues too. I could apply for the same role for him and be one of those people with 2 full time do nothing jobs. That should be conflict of interest enough, slinging ETH got Loop in after all.

With a name like Bill Cypher, I think I might support that.