I listened to an interview with Gavin Andresen in 2011 and he took as a given that blocks would increase.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

link?

He continued to think that way in 2017...

And they did, by an accounting trick, but they did.

They did. They made everybody go against SegWit2x in defense of SegWit4x.

other day i was thinking abt how you could do blocksize like the difficulty adjustment.

imagine how arbitrary 100gb/yr in storage is gonna seem in 15yrs, while it bottlenecks lightning and other protocols, but will also seem silly just to hardfork to new hardcoded values.

idk what you would peg the difficulty adjustment to tho

A node must be ridiculously small and easy to run.

Storage gets cheaper and faster every year

realistically we’re still making a trade-off tho.

say in 10yrs, even the homeless are running 100TB w great bandwidth on the cheapest phone out- that’s great, everyone’s running a node, but lightning doesn’t have enough bandwidth to onboard most ppl nor the mainchain. ppl are restricted to federations/custody for arbitrary reasons

https://amzn.asia/d/3NjTWEx

What about memory, CPU, bandwidth?

We already have PoW coins that chose different trade-offs like XMR or LTC/BCH. There's no need to change BTC - ever..

Agree

at this point it would do more much more harm to change since conservativeness and ossification have become such major values for btc

Block wars was a tough period.

Running a full node myself I really appreciate the reasonable disk space required. I'm assisting other beginners running a node and the 1TB requirement has been a very low barrier to entry... Not mentioning the low bandwidth requirements.

The off chain scaling solutions last 5 years have been amazing to see as well!

đź‘€