Yeah, from my initial, high level canvassing, I'd basically gathered that she was a person of interest who seemed to have figured out quite a bit. Her perspective seemed somewhat like perennialism or syncretism or omnism...something like that.

My guess is that I would agree with her more than I would agree with most people but we would probably have some differences and, to be fair, I'm living a full century plus later than her so I'm working with a different information set. She didn't have Churchward's work or Dispenza or Bentov or L/L Research or Dr. Gilbert or Dolores Cannon or Professor Hapgood or any of that stuff.

I probably canvassed her probably like 12 or 18 months ago so its been a while since I refreshed myself on her perspective but from what I do remember, she was able to put together a very solid perspective with relatively limited resources and that was worthy of celebration in my esteem as well.