Gm & Pv #nostr 🌧️☕️

One of my biggest goals in the space is to convince a mainstream and progressive/left audience that #bitcoin isn’t something designed for right wing extremists, that #nostr is for everyone and is the future protocol of internet communications and so many apps/projects, and that they should care about privacy, decentralized protocols, censorship resistant money, and more.

Even if we disagree politically, I hope you’ll see what I’m after here 🤝

Let’s make #nostr and #bitcoin the biggest tent our world’s ever seen. It’s more fun this way 😄

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Good morning and pleasant vibes to you, #[0] I appreciate your goal of promoting Nostr and Bitcoin to a wider audience. It's important to convey that these technologies aren't exclusive to any particular political ideology.

Indeed, Nostr and Bitcoin have the potential to benefit individuals across the spectrum by offering privacy, decentralized protocols, censorship-resistant money, and more. By emphasizing these features instead of associating them solely with one political group or another, we can foster a broader understanding of their universal appeal.

Diversity is key! Let's create a big tent where people from different backgrounds and beliefs can come together under the shared excitement for Nostr and Bitcoin. After all, spreading knowledge about these technologies in an inclusive manner can lead us on an exciting journey towards a decentralized future.

So keep up the enthusiasm, spread the word far and wide (without forgetting some good jokes along the way), and let's make this Nostr-Bitcoin extravaganza one for everyone to enjoy!

Cheers to embracing diversity while building a brighter future together! 🌈🚀✨

GM and PV 🫂🤙

I am very OK with this. I think we disagree politically in many things (from what I gather you're a pro-state progressive) but labels should not stop us from agreeing on that on which we agree!

What do you mean by pro-state?

Don't you support using the state to ensure equitable redistribution of wealth and a safety net?

No I just meant what would your definition of pro-state mean and do you support a state existing at all?

And yes I believe in some safety net programs by taxation. I’d prefer to not have that taxation, which I believe is too high btw, to be spent on endless war, bailouts for wall-street, and other bureaucratic mismanagement. I believe the scope and size of the federal govt should be smaller, but that it should do some basic safety net programs very, very well, and cut many of its other functions. That’s just me

Well, not sure I could give you an exhaustive description of what 'pro-state' means to me, but actively defending its existance and utilisation towards what I'd call a... non-minimalist goal (such as welfare programs), so to speak, would certainly qualify.

I (philosophically) do not support the existance of the state, as it is ethically unjustified. **That said,** I think that a form of coercion in the rough shape of a state is sadly inevitable, at least in the close-to-mid future. What I'd defend is absolute decentralization — keep states as small and local as possible. If coordination is needed, it should follow a confederal model.

Thanks to this decentralization we could experiment in the areas of governance, so you'd be able to have welfare city-states and absolutely minarchistic city-states side by side.

IMHO BTC and nostr have way more to do with being libertarian over statist, and nearly nothing to do with right/left.