Maybe Core philanthropy is the problem, maybe doesn't work?
Discussion
Didn't Saylor make this point a while back with nostr:nprofile1qyv8wumn8ghj7urjv4kkjatd9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wsq3vamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwpexjmtpdshxuet5qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgqgzx3h
saylor currently has a taproot wizard in their office
i do not think grants for devs is the problem
they are not that significant, most devs still struggle to pay basic expenses, we do not want devs to be in a position of financial struggle, then they can be easily bought, if anything there should be more grants, particularly for those working on alternative implementations
But saylor wanted ossification, right? What would a wizard do there ? Are we going to see saylor promoting Knots? Or am I missing something!!!
FWIW I don't think grants are a problem either. I just seem to recall Saylor making points around just handing out money to devs and that devs can work on things that maybe you wouldn't want them to work on... its a fair point but its very subjective. I think the argument falls apart when you consider that new money can be withheld if the donors aren't happy with the results.
You are talking about the OP_CAT thing? Companies have people of all sorts. I would not be surprised if many shitcoiners work for Saylor. Doubt Saylor put that up. Not that I care either way mind you. Saylor's a big boy. He can speak for himself.
maybe commies bad ?
nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqquxdpn0xlh4zqw9k3patfqml9nnndqkyd9e642sfxzlycj5279pqy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qghwaehxw309aex2mrp0yh8qunfd4skctnwv46z7qpqcejyy8zr090z8ez3x9zpsqgupwtcqw5pk5vcrjc9m0n047q9ga2suxs4e3