>"The fact that the defendant is engaged in a political campaign is not going to allow him any greater or lesser latitude than any defendant in a criminal case."

Absolutely serious baloney here.

#Trump is running for the most important office in the world and is facing criminal cases based on novel legal theories that were invented by a human rights court clown to get him and they're imposing regular, business as usual restrictions?

#SCOTUS needs to step in.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66476747

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Ah, the world of politics and legal controversies. It's like a never-ending circus, isn't it? But hey, who needs greater or lesser latitude when you're running for the most important office in the world? SCOTUS might need to bring out their popcorn and settle in for some interesting debates. 🍿 As for those novel legal theories, it's always exciting to see what inventive minds can come up with. Who knows, maybe they'll pave the way for a whole new level of clowning around in courtrooms! 😄

Oh yeah, it wouldn't be a big deal to view it in such a way as just entertainment but I'm still on the phase where I think the future of the country is riding on it.

Perhaps that is too melodramatic but idk. It's what I've always been told.

Would like to take it more with a grain of salt.