That's a good point. I'm sure a few luddite communities and hobbyist developers will always want to do this manually themselves.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

My main point is that's it's silly to masturbAIt on the tools.

Focus on the tractor, and you end up with degenerative mono-crops of toxic foods.

Focus on the skilled farmer and you end up with systems that barely even need tractors.

(I type this from such a farm btw)

I am (and always have been) excited about the skilled humans that know to design and delegate.

I am very tired of the hype-cycles of badly rebranded tools these humans have been using and building all along.

im very bullish on the skilled developers that are using teams of AI agents to do their job. for example, last week i had a nice meetup and conversation with nostr:npub14u83wvldmgdn0vyrwxmecpjt4xlwvqc9m7h40ylvrjjlade7wjnsk5ym97 who, as as senior developer, manages a team of 6 junior to intermediate developers. after his team completes their work, he does his job as their senior developer manager and reviews and merges all of the code together to build his project. his team? all AI agents. because of this, his company is able to have a team of 6 human developers and 36 AI developers, allowing them to save an incredible amount of money and save an incredible amount of time. this is what im bullish on. this new workflow.

It's not new. We've been automating things since forever and it has always been the best choice to delegate tasks to the most cost-effective actor.

The ability to **reliably** outsource more and more tasks to computer programs is following its unsurprisngly predictable trend.

And you're marketing the tool to me again, lol :winkwithtongue:

I'm betting that what makes mister Dark Sith unique isn't the tools he happens to use today.

what am i marketing to you? im just talking about what i love and what im passionate about.

what makes Sith unique here is that he built his own LLM, agents, and toolkit for his business.

1) agents (which is the wrong hype/focus imo)

2) exactly the part I can learn most from, and a very similar approach to what we're doing with nostr:npub1wf4pufsucer5va8g9p0rj5dnhvfeh6d8w0g6eayaep5dhps6rsgs43dgh9.

I don't get your point nostr:nprofile1qythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskuep0qyghwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnhd9hx2tcpzemhxue69uhku6t9dshxummnw3erztnrdakj7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t09uq3kamnwvaz7tm5dpjkvmmjv4ehgtnwdaehgu339e3k7mf0qqs2js6wu9j76qdjs6lvlsnhrmchqhf4xlg9rvu89zyf3nqq6hygt0sg6ruhh . Humans will not go away, we're shifting the way we work. As with any technical revolution - it can be used to empower or lessen one's humanity. My work with #purplestack is domesticating this wild tool, redirecting its vast energy for it to build things that empower my and my family and community's humanity.

I agree. It's just not such a big shift / revolution as it keeps being hyped up to be.

Same trend of smart entrepreneurs delegating tasks to cost-effective actors / automation / tools that serve them in providing reliable, useful things.

Same trend of most people focusing on the specific tools and how amazing and exciting they are, while not having a vision, goal, business or handle on cost-effectiveness.