It feels more like soft men (a majority) and stronger men (a minority) separated into non-intermixing fractions, each targeting its own audience.

Not all women are to blame, only those how mix up physical aggression and misbehavior with strong will and charisma.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

who*

Define soft and strong

This question should be rather addressed to nostr:npub1qfkcklnmes45z75y7y8dkud5yll8vp5eq5ysk9rmgqdxeasv8unsrfj6kq 😉

But here’s my take. A „soft“ man, which is not bad in my opinion, is a type of character that looks for compromises, even if it might have negative consequences, doesn’t want to decide waiting for approval, prefers to split responsibility.

A „strong“ man is essentially the opposite, which is, again, not necessarily good or bad.

Both shouldn’t be mixed up with insane violent idiots, who sacrificed their brains to testosterone. Also, it’s only my opinion.