Id argue RFK jr is right about vaccine damage reports and invermectin. For those insisting on scientific studies into these things, i find it more telling that the subject itself is purposely avoided or politically funded toeards the opposite conclusion with interesting exclusions. Go to vaccine damage group chats on places like gab ( as facebook and youtube deplatform these groups quickly) and notice how SIDS and speech regression seem to come out of nowhere after ther 18/24 month shots. During the covid hype, we ran an "underground pony paste" operarion at our church and helped hundreds of individuals with symptoms and positive tests get better within less than 10 hours. Stuff like this can't be reported without serious consequences, especially in a tyranical state that loves to punish people for fighting the narrative (wikileaks someone?).

I think it goes without saying that you need to do your own research, but i think its telling of peoples character when they are presented with a potential worldview change, what they decide to do with that information. Go find vaccine damage group chats and soak it up, look at the consistency and correlations, empathize. Stop pretending these people dont exist simply because they challenge the narrative you're smoking.

Regarding Kennedy, his stance on abortion is the unforgivable for me, and thus i couldnt in good conscience support him or anyone else as a candidate.