Nostr Web Client

> Saying that because something hasn’t happened yet

You're thinking in linear terms. It's not that something hasn't happened yet, it's that the current state of the world is X, which suggests that the world hasn't been altered by time travel.

Knightstr 2y ago

Would you agree that it’s a possibility that the civilization that were to invent time travel would have no use for “money” and as such, would have no incentive to alter the bitcoin time chain?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Carman 2y ago

No, money will always exist. Humans need a way to trade resources between each other

Knightstr 2y ago

In a world where you could time travel, theft likely be the primary form of acquiring things, imo.

Carman 2y ago

Then bitcoin will be even more important because it can be secured through secrets and time.

TBone 2y ago

Bitcoin is far more than money. This is not a valid argument.

Knightstr 2y ago

Fair. Do you agree that it’s possible that the civilization that were to invent time travel could potentially have no real incentive to alter the bitcoin time chain? Who’s to say it’s relevant to them?