> Saying that because something hasn’t happened yet
You're thinking in linear terms. It's not that something hasn't happened yet, it's that the current state of the world is X, which suggests that the world hasn't been altered by time travel.
> Saying that because something hasn’t happened yet
You're thinking in linear terms. It's not that something hasn't happened yet, it's that the current state of the world is X, which suggests that the world hasn't been altered by time travel.
Would you agree that it’s a possibility that the civilization that were to invent time travel would have no use for “money” and as such, would have no incentive to alter the bitcoin time chain?