Eh. I don’t think this is a convincing argument. It makes the assumption that a time traveling civilization would value bitcoin. Who’s to say time travel isn’t theoretically be invented in a post-bitcoin world, or by a non-human civilization somewhere in the universe?

The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. Saying that because something hasn’t happened yet, it’s clear time travel could never be possible simply isn’t a compelling argument. You could make that argument about a bunch of things.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The word 'may' was used used very intentionally. But it's a theory worthy of further conversation. 😁

Thanks for your input.

> Saying that because something hasn’t happened yet

You're thinking in linear terms. It's not that something hasn't happened yet, it's that the current state of the world is X, which suggests that the world hasn't been altered by time travel.

Would you agree that it’s a possibility that the civilization that were to invent time travel would have no use for “money” and as such, would have no incentive to alter the bitcoin time chain?

No, money will always exist. Humans need a way to trade resources between each other

In a world where you could time travel, theft likely be the primary form of acquiring things, imo.

Then bitcoin will be even more important because it can be secured through secrets and time.

Bitcoin is far more than money. This is not a valid argument.

Fair. Do you agree that it’s possible that the civilization that were to invent time travel could potentially have no real incentive to alter the bitcoin time chain? Who’s to say it’s relevant to them?