Maybe I’m still just an idiot that doesn’t get it…

But I still think cashu, liquid, drive chains, e cash, etc

Are all shitcoins

I’m seeing more and more about this nonsense everyday it seems like.

Those who say lightning can’t scale to 8 billion people…. I disagree

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You’re contradicting yourself buddy!

You want lightning scaling but you’re listing CashU as a shitcoin lol

Lightning custodial maybe...

But lightning non custodial can't absolutely scale for the whole world.

At least at this stage.

Maybe with multi-peer channels things can get better.

"There is no second best"

This goes for layers too.

🤣🤙

All in shitcoins go

Here's a scenario that has made me consider, in this case liquid btc.

If I am running my own lightning node, and onchain fees are getting mental high, it makes rebalancing channels or opening/closing really unfeasibly expensive. What could be a solution? Maybe I hold sats in reserve for that use case in a custodial lightning wallet......there are trust issues. I found that holding small amounts in liquid btc that I can use through boltz to swap directly into lightning on my node makes those costs simply go away. It's not ideal as there is obviously also an issue with trust involved with liquid and it may or may not be, and I suspect definitely won't be, a final perfect solution.

Partially correct in the sense that those sats aren't bonafide on-chain UTXOs, but imagine 500 million people trying to get into a 4MB block. 2 billion