Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar hzrd149

I think this is cleaner than NIP-22

after reading though NIP-22 again im not really a fan of the meta-tags that it has in the "o" and "r" tags for a few reasons

- The first index of the "o" or "r" tag uses a ":" to separate the values then the following indexes use spaces?

- The "o" and "r" tags have no way of indexing pubkeys. so we wouldn't be able to pull all comments that reply to a pubkey

- Why do we need to reply to URLs, topics or geohashes? cant we just reply to events that represent those things?

IMHO a generic comment kind:1111 + NIP-10 + a "k" tag would be the most elegant solution

Avatar
MichaelJ 1y ago

The tagging suggestions in the NIP-22 proposal are a bit of a mess. I, for one, am not a fan of the significant uppercase 'K' tag. There's a lot riding on a minor distinction, there.

When you need a table to explain all the different tag value combinations, the tagging system is too complex.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Laeserin 1y ago

Yeah, I was like, TL;DR.

Thread collapsed