Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar rabble

We went with MLP 2.0 because it’s got some trademark protections to keep somebody from rebuilding and releasing the app under the Nos name. I’m a big fan of MIT when it comes to open source licenses. We’re pretty focus on the Nos implementation. But if somebody wants to work with us to extract code and help create an SDK that we and others could potentially use, we’d be open to re-licensing the code needed under MIT.

Avatar
Terry Yiu 2y ago

Perfect. We’ll proceed with this approach then. Thanks for this and your team’s work on Nos.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.