Peter is the same as every Satoshi candidate. There’s enough there to implicate him and enough discrepancies to sow doubt. In this particular case the filmmakers did a bad job with their theory. Don’t be dazzled by something just because someone put music to it.
Discussion
It wasn’t so much the dazzling presentation, he just seemed like a nervous wreck while he was being accused. I’m all for being skeptical, but the instant rejection of the possibility is a bit of a red flag.
The whole theory as presented in the documentary is flat out wrong. https://x.com/peterktodd/status/1843962404792652000?s=46
So you wouldn't be nervous being filmed by a HBO crew while being framed as the person who owns over a million bitcoin? Can you imagine what a target that would make you. It's a lot harder for Peter to prove he isn't Satoshi that it is for some hack film maker to say he is Satoshi.