Ok. Youβve said this multiple times. Can you explain exactly what your problem is with an RPi if Iβm not running anything super compute intensive?
Discussion
Now you don't have the option to run something intensive.
When for the same price you could have had a relay + node + media server in one.
Sure, if I want to run something heavy Iβll upgrade, but if it fits my compute power needs would you still have a problem with it?
Why "upgrade" when you could have paid less for a better PC? This is my issue with RPi. Usually upgrades are more expensive.
Fair enough. So your basic point is that I should just buy more computer than I need in case I want to run something else because itβll be easier to buy too much than upgrade and migrate.
Yes basically. I started with RPi too, everyone on twitter had them and a cool case. But it wasn't even enough power to run a mid level lightning node that balanced channels once every 5 minutes.
Speaking from experience here! I'm mad that bitcoiners all recommended it and it's a piece of shit π§‘
π
Later this month I have to move a cluster I built from 36 tower PCβs and 100βs of meters of infiniband.
Itβs amazing what you can do with a pallet of refurb. π
Infiniband sounds like Cisco
Mellanox
The cables cost more than the PCβs.
I needed to build a memory fabric and lots of sockets+infiniband was the most scalable way to do it.
Mellanox, crazy expensive cables, infiniband, so Cisco
Actually technically Mellanox was acquired by NVIDIA..
ever since nvidia acquired them
I seem to recall it was pretty expensive tech even before NVIDIA acquired them. Iβm sure NVIDIA cranked up the price.
Yeah, cables are $1000sβ¦
Interesting, I have ~100x of these lying around.
When did they get that expensive? Bought some for maybe 200 a few years ago
Good to hear your perspective. I think RPi gained traction because it was easy to setup with Umbrel with little knowledge/skills. For me, I have no idea what to do with Ubuntu or Debian on a small PC - drivers etc
