You could pay 15 BTC for this logo or you could download my copy for free 🤷♂️ 
Discussion
Voy por el tuyo 😊🤣🤣🤣
They're not really asking that are they? What a scam
Tienen caca en la cabeza los de magazzine
Alto ponzi
RIP shitcoin
Is there any way to tell if there are actual bids, or if any of this is selling? I still can’t believe this is real.
This shit is real?
Unfortunately
Oof.
What in the shit? Do buyers actually think they'll own the rights to the Bitcoin logo???
🤦🤦🤦
I appreciate your generosity. I saved it twice, I hope you don't mind.
Feel free. I am a generous man.
What a rip off. I mean I have another one here for just 7.5BTC. 😜😜
I don’t get it, they are making a killing hosting conferences, why do this shit to alienate real bitcoiners? Dumbass
Fucking hypocrites
🤦♂️ 
sigh 😔 again this is stupid. Even a pleb like me knows that.
What a stupid way to show what an NFT could be.
Maybe I’m the only one who thinks NFTs could be used in gaming,
no coins or bull shit. If I earn or purchase an item in a game it’s a NFT with value and a marketplace to trade and sell across all digital content. The ultimate digital marketplace. Anyways…
I get the hate on NFT, I’m with ya but there’s a little part of me that’s wants some sort of recognized value in digital content.
I collect physical things related to games, music and technology, ya know that shit you collect cause ya just like it. Some of those things are worthless and some have value and attempt to sell if needed.
Ok I’m done 🤘🏼💜
The only use case I can think of after so many years of this shit is gaming and no company did it successfully. All the triple A gaming companies would rug pull you eventually anyway, so I dont really see even how it could work in fiat gaming companies.
Issuing monke jpegs on Bitcoin is truly appalling. And a beautiful way to finish any possible connection to plebs.
Thank you shitcoin magazine, GFY.
With collectibles it comes down to either scarcity (more demand than supply) or a personal/sentimental connection giving it value. Physical objects can be scarce. Digital files are not. There may be personal/sentimental reasons for a person to want to pay for a digital file (a movie, for instance), but that does not make it scarce. NFTs in general are masqueraded as something they are not—digital scarcity. The particular behavior coming from Bitcoin Magazine here not only claims that these digital files are scarce, but that they are forever attached to a serialized satoshi, which does not even exist in the bitcoin protocol. Satoshis don’t actually exist at all! They are simply a unit of measure for denominating UTXOs. If people or companies want to buy and sell digital files, then so be it. But Bitcoin Magazine falsely representing bitcoin something other than what it is, and actively attempting to profit off of their misrepresentations, is extremely problematic.
All of that makes a lot of sense.
15 BTC for a BTC Urinal? It’s not even yellow!
15 btc for a jpeg
People stupidity never fails to amaze me