So far I've not come across one WoT problem that cannot be solved by just using:

A. Follow lists

B. Computation done by competing DVM's #WoT

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

We don't need users to go and input how much they trust Alice for X and Bob for Y.

"computation done by competing DVMs" 😅

Why ask users to compute how much they trust Alice for curating content about gardening carrots in the tropics and every other specific thing.

Why not instead pay DVM's with access to all this public Nostr data to do it.

Also, why even use question marks. 😂

BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO QUESTION EVERYTHING

Hahaha, I can just hear the 4 year old's voice #whyeverything

Sometimes, there is no better answer than “why?”

WoT typically involves computing some trust level within a context. I think we need specific trust attestations and use DVMs (and manual observations, why not) on what to trust someone on

Remember that likes, zaps, etc can all be faked

I know. But for what use case do we need it?

I'm processing your idea. It might work