I did not say that. What are you talking about.
Discussion
You're conflating skin with culture. That's what I'm talking about.
I spoke not of skin but of identity.
I see, it seems to me as though you are conflating race (a biological condition) with identification (a psychological condition) I think that I can see from your words that you are not actually racist and are prepared to give anyone a fair chance but your use of these words incorrectly creates a disconnect in understanding, perhaps leading you to a racial bias (or "soft racism"), not so much intentional racism but more of a learned protection mechanism, sometimes attributed to a "reverse halo effect".
My note is about racism, not culture.
I said racial differences are real. I said nothing about competence. I spoke of incentives. Incentives drive action, white people are capable of anything evil. I am suggesting that when money is fixed our metric which we use to determine outcomes will give us a more pure system of measuring each other and many problems will either dissapear or manifest as truth. You are gorcing your opinion of what you believe about racism on me which is naive and reactionary.
You are sowing the same seed of division the statists love to see. Because when we fight over stupid things and refuse to confront reality we lose and they win. We have to be logical and objective with regards to race if we are going to find real and permanent solutions to racial hate. Denying anothers opinion blindly only excaserbates the divide. There is no agree to disagree. There is productive speech, or destructive speech. Jumping on a moral high horse while being arrogant and blind is one of my personal failures.
Like I said from the start, you can fuck off and block me if you disagree. I never intended to fight with you about anything. You're back peddling now and it's pathetic. I made my position clear. Take it or leave it.
You're also gas lighting me. Fuck off.