Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar f0xr

note1hjgygm7qywfq984sp3jhpc33l3v6m97lhqfnrkrqp6cg4sntjdcsfvhpw4

If people are still using barter, that's fine, they don't need money.

If they do need money, I'm suggesting e-cash could be converted into PHYSICAL CASH. I don't know how to be more clear, you don't seem to be reading my words. PHYSICAL CASH. PAPER BILLS. I'm not suggesting an African grandmother needs to buy a smartphone. You're the one implying that e-cash isn't worth developing because you need a smartphone to use it. I'm the one arguing you might not need a smartphone to use it.

Avatar
Theory of Everything 1y ago

No. I am arguing that ecash fits a niche group of people technologically adept enough to use ecash effectively. Not that it is not worth developing, That it has an extremely small market fit.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
f0xr 1y ago

Thread collapsed