Alright crew. I need help accruing “foreign” resources.

I am going to be having a formal debate with a BSV maxi on his two claims:

1) Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto

2) BSV is the original Bitcoin

What I’m looking for is the strongest arguments and evidence FOR his case PROVING these two points to find the individual attack vectors that he wants to throw my way, and see exactly how to disprove them. If you know of resources (articles, papers, etc.) that argue in agreement to these two claims, please post them below, or DM them to me. Thank you.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Use ChatGPT

Why? 🤔

To hopefully show some of these people that they’re in a cult and can leave if they want to

Just be sure you’re wearing your vest. This sound dangerous,:)

Definitely the Gavin Andersen blog post saying Craig proved it in person to him

Also, literally anything posted on coingeek(.)com. Seems to be the BSV’er database for trying to prove Craig is satoshi

I applaud your efforts. This sounds like a good strategy. Unfortunately I have no idea how someone might argue that CSW is satoshi.

What you may want to do is create a BSV account on twitter and trash the maxis to hear their arguments. Looking forward to the debate.

Craig Wright is a fraud and arguing with anyone of his cult is a dead end.

I also get enjoyment out of it if we’re being honest

arguing is better then ignoring.

Prepare to bang your head against the wall.

Who does he associate himself with - says it all really…

No point arguing with stupid, they drag you down to their level and beat you with experience!

C'mon man , don't give pearls to the pigs ! No point on doing that ..

There is only one argument: NYKNYC

The only thing that matters is can he move the coins. If not, bitcoin dgaf if he is Satoshi or not.

Check out the Dr. Bitcoin podcast: https://anchor.fm/dr-bitcoin

Just tell him have fun staying poor and watch ‘em go broke. Bitcoin fixes the money, not the stupid.