Nostr Web Client

I disagree. I think adding any content is defiantly editorializing. If things are fair, everyone should get their content displayed equally.

..and my blog post is about what changes I would make to Section 230, and I think getting rid of ALL contextual blocks around a person’s posts is a good idea and meaningful reform.

Matt Hamilton [Maryland] 2y ago

nostr:npub109x0x9dlft64y4h9vz9mxu92qpqn752sd8p4xe2zkcanlzmk2fcq3pwvvl nostr:npub1y7urda0puhzwr8rsw9vs7fclzk9c8fhc5zhpc8y2kyr68g9z4axqynagv7 nostr:npub108zt8c43ulvdwnax2txurhhr07wdprl0msf608udz9rvpd5l68ascvdkr5 nostr:npub1znavx0efn9y7a9tjux6pchjdurmw2e84fxwxflmauupjz0558x0sqmwtpl I edited my post. The mistake you're making is the word "editorializing". You are correct that opining about content is, by definition, editorializing. However the word "editorializing" does not appear anywhere in section 230 and has nothing to do with the protections offered by section 230.

The protections are for screening/limiting availability of content, and not being treated as a publisher as long as the host is not a speaker.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

djsumdog 2y ago

I’m not saying it does. In fact it doesn’t. That’s the problem. The blog post I wrote/linked is about how I would change Section 230. My issue is that it currently doesn’t say anything about editorializing.