the down sides of a new protocol no-one to hot fix issues as they arrive. With the funding from SATs we really should.see more mature clients and features to beat stagnation. at the end of the day we have no killer app just a bunch of clones of other apps, not that that's totally bad it just means slow progress to adoption and with such a small userbase the incentive to post is just to damn low. people need to feel seen on a social network.
Discussion
It’s worth noting that Nostr isn't that new—it’s 1/8th the age of the web. Bluesky, in just 2 years (half the time), has grown10 million users, adding more daily than Nostr has in 4 years. A key reason is Bluesky’s developers work constructively on the protocol, and they’ve invested in infrastructure, while nostr infrastructure is neglected. Some excellent devs with grants are working hard, but others seem to have eased off. Many shy away from the simpler devops work, or onboarding fixes, opting instead for novel, unproven solutions.
