Doing both. Its a long shot but so is getting people on boarded to bitcoin. I can walk away saying I tried and failed versus failed by not trying.
Discussion
Getting people on board with bitcoin is in the individual's best interest & it naturally snowballs in our favor.
Working for some sort of constitutional change (as if the federal govt gives 2 shits about obeying the constitution anyway) will most likely just be a tremendous waste of time & energy & reources, to fight against all the natural govt incentives, for something that will be effectively undone or otherwise made meaningless by default in just a matter of months or years after it is achieved.
You can't fight criminals via the channels they set up for you to fight them.
Out of curiostity what would the amendment be that you want to see added?
Term limits were mentioned, but I actually think that would have the opposite of the desired effect & create even more of a tragedy of the commons sort of problem. People just getting in to take as much as possible before they're out. And even more power would just be handed over to the permanent unelected bureaucracy.
Term limits, I question that too. If my call, I would have the 16th amendment removed along with the Federal Reserve Act.
But the key point is to educate people and get them united behind a common cause or two.
There are many other changes I can foresee too, but if people are just going to stand by and do nothing. Gameover.
Bitcoin & Nostr & 3d printed guns & all the other tools being built are not nothing. Fuck the govt, build a family & real forms of wealth & independence. Raise happy healthy kids. There's your better world.