Right, so in the example you've cited you're trading on the previously established reputations in Nostr to show that you and nostr:nprofile1qyxhwumn8ghj7e3h0ghxjme0qyd8wumn8ghj7urewfsk66ty9enxjct5dfskvtnrdakj7qghwaehxw309aex2mrp0yh8qunfd4skctnwv46z7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t09uqs7amnwvaz7t6qdehhxtnvdakz7qgcwaehxw309ucnjv3wxymrst349cmnww358q6rstcpx4mhxue69uhnyvmpwdjxvctnvce8yve5x9nkucnjwf5x56rhvankzerxvenkzumxwdskgenpwdskvcfw0puh5tcprpmhxue69uhkzapwdehhxarjwahhy6mn9e3k7mf0qyf8wumn8ghj7vfwdehh5arj9e3k7mf0qyd8wumn8ghj7ctyw4k8gt338pcxcatn9eek7cmfv9kz7qpql2vyh47mk2p0qlsku7hg0vn29faehy9hy34ygaclpn66ukqp3afq0wtw0u are different people...
yep! and in a perfectly pseudonymous world, if we have GrapeRank or another reputation system, you could get the same after some history of pro-social action on the protocol.
(or even without those automated systems, clients could try to show histories nicely)
No replies yet.
