I stopped reading after a few words, when I realized you were making a retarded metaphor. Do you have a real sentence or two to explain why killing violent criminals is bad, or why I should pay for court and prison (repeatedly) for violent criminals?
Discussion
Think of crime as noise distorting the signal of societal progress.
1. I'm not saying that we shouldn't remove distortions.
2. I am saying that distortions will naturally reoccur so even if some broad sweeping measure is attempted and is successful, that doesn't stop new psychopaths from being born.
3. The underlying cause could be described in many words but most of them lead back to ego. When people learn how to keep the ego in check, we will have less dishonesty. That'll help a lot. There's a great paucity of honesty on this planet, including intellectual dishonesty.
4. Given that many Bitcoiners are wealthy enough to afford to homeschool, it also seemed like a good opportunity to point out that religious and government schools don't give students robust discernment and that is intentional. Not only is that a major hurdle for us to overcome if we are to change the world, it is something we must guard against propagating to the next generation.
5. I always have a firearm within arm's reach and that's just what's within arm's reach. I recommend everyone else do the same. Power is a virtue. Having the power to overcome an attacker is a virtue. The question is, once you've overpowered your attacker, do you balance out your power with mercy?
Frankly, I can't condone the death penalty but I have no problem with banishment or even "banishment packs" of nations or territories who afford one another reciprocity when a banishment has been issued.
You don't have to kill. You don't have to interact with them at all. You can ship them to some remote as fuck area and say "Good fuckin luck. Ain't nobody around for 500 miles in any direction. Nobody wants you so you can be here now because this place sucks and nobody wants to be here."