I'm arguing it's labels and emotions for the same outcome on paper.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Ok then. So you agree with me that if I am salary with no PTO I ought to get my salary increased.

Yeah absolutely. You cost the company the same on payroll regardless.

There are probably some intangibles. Plenty of companies beg there employees to take time off to reduce burnout. Raising productivity.

Right. A semantics game to make people feel better about taking off. Meanwhile when you don't, that's extra cash free to be invested.

Maybe

Maybe whatever days you don’t take off should be paid out yearly instead of accruing to some end date where you leave the company.

Still stand by that taking a break from work is healthy and it makes sense work incentivizes time off.

I agree, but a company witholding YOUR money, and offering BACK to you as an inventive for you to take more time off because you didn't plan to take time off is a semantics and emotions game. Often times that PTO gets paid out as a bonus and can get taxed at a higher rate.

It's also a one-sized fits a approach to, you get 2 weeks off vacation, and hope that's some healthy recovery... Maybe some need more, some less. I should be allowed to choose.

As a company why would I would I let you cost me money without producing anything?

Business's are just a big balance sheet. They have no emotion. At the end of the day they don't care. They can't care.