Would love to, but as far as I understand, it's a different kind of note that currently only shows in #Amethyst (I posted a note with voting just a few minutes before posting this one). It's currently opposed by people arguing that such a core feature (polls) shouldn't be that closely tied to zapping. The situation gets muddier with others claiming that another protocol proposal can solve normal non-zapping polls. Then another person chimed in with a proposal for general form filling, which is getting some traction as far as I can tell, but it doesn't include any option to price the options, so we'll have to wait on this one a little longer :/
Discussion
Oh, now I see it in Amethyst. 😁
PS: I think it should be connected to zapping. Otherwise, you might get someone with a bunch of identities fucking the results. At least make it costly.
Agreed, but I understand what tehy want to make it optional dependency, not a required feature. That way they can make it either free/cost zap/require proof of work, at least in theory. Still, pooling situation right now is glum.