“If you don't care about it, it simply means that you don't care about the privacy of others.”

Wrong. I respect the privacy of others, I also believe you’re a clown if you think that every other human being on the planet agrees. If they did, we wouldn’t need curtains because voluntarily no-one would look inside anyone else’s windows.

You are trying to impose your views on other people which is antithetical to the values you’re espousing. No-one else is under any obligation to you, it’s not their job to protect your identity.

And this has nothing to do with “rejecting surveillance” - people choosing to go to a conference are not being “surveilled” by other people at the conference taking photos, that’s a stupid conflation on your part.

I see nothing in your post about the hotel/conference CCTV, the biometrics taken at the airport (face scans, fingerprints, gait measures etc) upon arrival, the actual real world surveillance we are all subjected to in public on a day-to-day basis which are things you could rightfully be upset about.

Railing against people who paid to attend the same conference as you is silly.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Triggered?

Not expecting anyone to disagree with you and be able to articulate why?

No, it just sounds like you're triggered.

It sounds like you’ve got no rebuttal and hadn’t really thought through calling people taking photos at a conference, “surveillance”.

You're still angry

You’re still projecting 🤙

StackSats.IO: You are just an imbecile talking about subjects you have no knowledge of. Go study law, and then come back.

Which law would you like me to study Pedro? Be specific now.

Search for "Bitcoin Atlantis"...

Ok, this is from the first result.

Now what? Be specific Pedro.

Are you so stupid that you can't even read what's written on the very images you share? Am I talking to a mentally handicapped person?