Replying to Avatar Saberhagen The Nameless

Another non-sequitur price argument that has nothing to do with what we were discussing, Skipper npub12rrvutnfeu9677d4yjytypqccjn0njnm6zkx2j6xyn2uqfw02ldsrl8ty9

You can still use Bitcoin for long term hodling if you so wish, dingus. I'm talking about transactional privacy. They don't have to be mutually exclusive
Avatar
Vortex | CTV | LNHANCE 1y ago

Look at the OP of this thread, you're the one that decided to reply to it, my guess is being upset about your bags losing value.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Saberhagen The Nameless 1y ago

You're the one who started throwing insults and seems upset. Sorry, Bitcoin is surveillance chain by design. It can't be good at everything. Trade offs exist in real life.

Red herring back to price (nothing to do with privacy)

Avatar
Vortex | CTV | LNHANCE 1y ago

Trade offs like don't put your money into a sinking ship? Yah I tried to tell you that.

Avatar
Saberhagen The Nameless 1y ago

Weird, I don't seem to remember telling you how I'm allocated. Keep throwing those herrings 🐟 Let me know when you want to get back on the topic of privacy

Bitcoin @ $10 is no more private than it is @ $1,000,000