I like the first part of your argument even though i disagree. It seemed we're playing with different definitions of if a god or what god is.

This is the danger with organized religious thought, no clear agreed upon definitions because it not about understanding it is simply another tool used by those who wish to control.

Some very interesting conversations could be had trying to define god, gods or a god like process/systems/fields.

I see only very destructive outcomes from the current modern use and definition of god by all organized religions. As they prey upon our vulnerabilities and amplify the worst aspects of our species.

Your last sentence is incorrect.

Yes the universe began in a state of maximum order/minimal entropy and inevitably increases entropy with time, but there can be no act of creation that does not continue this process. We can create small pockets of entropy minimized zones, but we are externalising the cost into other regions. Intelligent design can not reduce entropy. (I hate this fact)

Knowing the battle is impossible but choosing to fight it anyway, could be a good definition for humanity.