Without doubt, ownership of land is crucial to any citadel concept, in spite of how flimsy property rights may have proven to be in certain places

Also I like the idea of making the screening more difficult. An investment group is a good start

nostr:npub1jmy8weweqzckna0amz7pn0uhhkxx693l7st23829ewmu43yvjsesfp6xcq was very insightful talking about this in relation to a property in Australia, in particular to the opportunity cost of land vs more BTC

So a group willing to forgo BTC to buy land lowers the risk for each investor in a sense

Plus yes, the idea of trading directly between specialised operations makes lots of sense

Love to hear more about how you get on

๐Ÿ‘

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

My opportunity cost for every decision is denominated in sats now. I suspect that many of the "investors" I'd be calling on are similar & would feel that the cost in sats is too great right now.

I expect that in the next 18-24 months, this will change.

I see a world with many citadels dotted around where people are able to elevate their optionality. This is the meshtadel concept.

The โ€œmeshtadelโ€

Love that phrase. First time Iโ€™ve heard it ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘

It's not new & I certainly didn't coin the phrase although I did use it in the citadel presentation 3 years ago.

Weren't you paying attention? ๐Ÿคฃ

Haha. Clearly no close enough!

I guess I was just trying to process how this legend of a bearded man was teaching me to wake the f**k up & start building a defensive housing & food setup

๐Ÿ˜œ

The โ€œmeshtadelโ€

Love that phrase. First time Iโ€™ve heard it ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘ ๐Ÿ‘

And yes I totally agree that in a not too distant future, Bitcoiners might well want to re-allocate into alternative hard assets (eg land)