Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Sam

I believe it is an elitist form of money. You need higher than normal technical skills to acquire, hold, and use. There will be millions if not billions of people who need it and can’t get it unless they provide “value”. Which basically makes them working servants.

Currently you need the luxury of extra funds and the proper equipment to buy and hold, that is very difficult for a large majority.

A large sum of people that are buying do not self custody. They will likely lose their coins if the value ever shifts.

I love the good it can bring, but ultimately humanity will still be split by the Haves and Have-nots.

Plus, as Wall Street continues to get into it from ETFs and Miner stocks…we are letting legacy institutions that have been corrupted wiggle in. Can they end up with control if we aren’t careful? History says yes.

Avatar
Andy 2y ago 💬 1

There's also a lot of folks without internet (2.9B) or electricity (770M) in the world. I don't really think of those as elitist technologies normally. Maybe I should. Similar idea? Different?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

28
Sam 2y ago

Definitely similar. I don’t know if elitist is the right word, but having internet and electricity is definitely an advantage/luxury.

Thread collapsed